[ad_1]

English Heritage and the historical facility think Silbury Hill to be a chalk mound. UNESCO explains it as the biggest manmade mound in Europe. Owning past this ancient monolith today it is rather simple to easily accept this easy description.

However, if we actually dig a bit much deeper and look additional afield, exists something more to Silbury Hill than simply a chalk mound?

English Heritage goes even more to validate Silbury Hill to be a 4,500 years of age ritualistic chalk mound, influenced by “” routine”” and constructed by our Pagan/ Druid pre-Christian ancientors. The date is mostly due to archaeologist Professor Richard Atkinson following the dig, sponsored by the BBC, from 1968-1970, which produced a series of historical programs. The TELEVISION series was created to increase the general public ' s awareness of archaeology by aiming to expose the inner tricks of Silbury Hill with the interesting possibility, as they advanced through the hill, they may find a big golden statue of King Sil on horseback or some other treasure At the center of the hill.

It was not a surprise that no treasure was discovered. They discovered an antler on the hill outside the entryway to the tunnel which was radiocarbon dated to 4,500 years. As no interesting artefacts ' were discovered in the making of the TELEVISION program the antler gotten in prominence. In some way it was chosen this antler was utilized in the building of Silbury Hill. The substantial illogical leap quickly followed – Silbury Hill should likewise be roughly 4,500 years of ages – and in turn verified the suspicious date for Stonehenge at 4,500 years of ages!!

Interestingly, Josh McDowell and Don Stewart at a Yale University research study yielded 3 various ages for the exact same antler – 5,340 years, 9,310 years, and 10,320 years. What triggered variations in the outcome can be discussed – limestone contamination of the sample. Did English Heritage picked a date to match the existing age for Stonehenge and how could they potentially understand it was utilized in the building?

Professor Atkinson did not make any notes to tape-record his dig, however he did an interview in The Listener explain Silbury Hill as ' an exceptionally made complex and extremely colored layer cake ' and as a ' wedding event cake ', and the natural mound formed ' A type of extreme biological club sandwich '- a hint to something more than a random stack of chalk?

So, I was resigned to that in our life time, we would be entrusted the Atkinson tradition and in my view the historical facility had actually seriously misinterpreted, misrepresented and maltreated Silbury Hill.

But Atkinson left another tradition, an unsteady English Heritage monolith, which triggered a collapse in the vertical shaft dug by Edward Drax (with Cornish miners) in1776 This produced an open hole at the top of the hill in May2000

When the hole appeared some regional scientists ' terminated down the shaft and recorded some fascinating discoveries – sharp corners and smooth walls suggesting the existence of a chamber inside the hill and considerable levels of electrostatic electrical power which ruined a cellphone which had actually been accidently removed into The shaft.

The discovery of the chamber verified the experience of Mrs LF Brooks from Pewsey, who talked to the Marlborough Times in August1962 She explained how throughout the First World War she utilized to live extremely near the hill and was informed by her moms and dads that there were Caverns inside. When the entryway collapsed, in 1915, a small passage led firstly downwards and after that changed course and continued upwards. Often it forked, with one method causing a dead end and the other to a cavern ' about as huge as a space '. Beyond this there was another cavern much like the very first: We took candle lights in with us and utilized to compose our names on the ceiling with the candle light smoke '. The entire system should have tackled 3 parts through the hill, ' she stated. ' And it was extremely frightening … my bro would burn out the candle light and I would be frightened. '

On the fascinating concern of energy levels at Silbury Hill, I fulfilled Dr Oleg Khavroshkin, Head of Nonlinear Seismology Lab, Russian Academy of Sciences, Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, in Bosnia in September2008 With advanced clinical devices, he and his Team had actually determined electrostatic energy, electromagnetic fields inside and seismic waves originating from the pointer of all the primary pyramids in Egypt. He discovered that each pyramid had its own distinct transmission frequency.

So, the collapse of the shaft stimulated English Heritage to start the Silbury Hill Conservation and Restoration task in 2007/2008 therefore started my severe research study into Silbury Hill.

The newest proof discovered throughout this task in 2007/2008 by English Heritage archaeologists consisting of bugs and ants plus core samples drawn from the hill in 2002 would even more validate English Heritage ' s assertion that Silbury Hill was 4500 years of ages. No forensic science strategies or cleanroom centers were utilized in the elimination of these samples from exactly what is an extremely polluted and contaminated hill! If this was a murder scene, any proof would be considered inadmissible!

Similar from my examinations the Mollusc shells discovered deep inside the hill which were dated by the University of Mexico to over 12,000 years together with flint flakes of comparable date fount in pits at the top of the very first phase of the hill. Unfortunately this proof should likewise be considered inadmissible due to contamination and speculation. It would be hard to validate my assertion that Silbury Hill was constructed around 12,000 years earlier.

Neverheless never ever quickly ended up being obvious, with a variety of discoveries, eg accurate chalk blocks, big pieces of sarsen stone at the top, chambers inside, flint flakes at the center and a consistent sheet of product covering the base of the building, that Silbury Hill Is something more than a chalk mound. Brand-new proof points to the unique possibility that Silbury Hill was initially a white pyramid and exactly what we see today is the remains of a pyramid mound?

English Heritage eliminated big pieces of sarsen stone from the top of Silbury Hill in2007

“” The discovery of big pieces of sarsen stones near the top of the last stage of the monolith has actually likewise been a surprise. Spirits of dead forefathers “”.

Newspaper quote from Jim Leary, Archaeologist, English Heritage The Independent Thursday 25 October 2007

English Heritage made no effort to learn the measurement, shape and the structure of another crucial piece of proof – a consistent and unbroken membrane/ sheet of dark brown butter-textured product, 5mm thick and stone-free, which appears to cover the Base of this chalk building. Samples were sent out to Arizona University and they declared it might have the residential or commercial properties of a kind of Mica called Illite which had actually been ' softened ' by water translucenting the building over the lots of centuries.

If we look even more afield, it looks Silbury Hill is sharing clinical functions and residential or commercial properties with great deals of pyramids and pyramid mounds discovered on every continent in the world. It appears from continuous clinical research study, especially with the Egyptian pyramids, that these pyramid structures were utilized as multifunctional energy sources transforming the natural circulation of ionic existing into electrostatic electrical power and by means of crystalline stone transducers such as granite and sarsen into other kinds of energy consisting of Magnetic, seismic and air filtration (Bionizer) residential or commercial properties.

So, there are great deals of persuading clinical and non-scientific ideas to recommend that Silbury Hill is something more than a load of chalk.

It is most likely there might have been numerous comparable building and constructions to Silbury Hill in this substantial ancient Wessex complex a lot of which have actually given that vanished. Intriguingly, at 4,500 years earlier, there is no proof of the population needed in this location at this time to develop the ancient structures and megaliths such as Stonehenge!

Although it was improperly harmed by the Saxons who smashed the big sarsen cap to make method for a look-out post and later on by a series of tunnels dug by so-called archaeologists, it appears Silbury Hill made it through due to the fact that of its size, position and the Gradually grassing over of the monolith by nature.

The Romans, who had a settlement nearby to Silbury Hill, should have produced some illustrations or mosaics of exactly what was an outstanding structure at this time. Ideally someplace in some beautiful house or museum is concealed such a record?

Or perhaps we need to wait on the development of science such as Ground Penetrating Radar Equipment connected to satellites to memorable unblemished ancient websites to be studied thoroughly and open mindedly with the most recent forensic science strategies?

However, all declares to the age and function of Silbury Hill can just be hypothesized at this time. Neverheless I would motivate readers to check out Silbury Hill to describe the distinct energy of this ancient website and form their own concepts and viewpoints – was Silbury Hill at the dawning of mankind and who were the well-informed contractors?

[ad_2]