[ad_1]

You’re taking the nice, you are taking the dangerous, you are taking them each and there you’ve gotten The Hangover Half II , a film that takes every part intelligent and amusing about its first half and turns it into one thing of a retread. We've seen all of it earlier than, and we actually know the story: just a few pals get approach too drunk, get up with no reminiscence of something that occurred, and need to go on a fact-finding mission to get well the items of the night time earlier than. The movie falls into the entice of its formulation and can’t appear to get out. It labored within the first one as a result of there's no cause that any of that stuff ought to have occurred – it was not within the nature of these characters – however now it’s of their nature, we're taught to anticipate it, and there's no cause it ought to have occurred. Once more. Perhaps that's humorous to some individuals, but it surely belies the originality of the characters, characters I grew to like within the first movie.

The Hangover was a personality examine, if you concentrate on it. Yeah, it was a buddy film, and a highway film, and a raunchy, R-rated comedy a couple of night time of heavy consuming, however, on the danger of spoiling the joke, it was additionally about 4 guys with extreme character issues studying about themselves. On condition that, the movie was attention-grabbing, and never simply humorous. It was a character-driven comedy, with dialogue fastidiously designed for the second. Comedies are funniest when the conditions are natural. The Hangover took that concept and flipped it on its head, making the punchlines the joke and the jokes the punchline, telling the whole movie backwards, and inserting our characters in conditions that weren’t natural, however turned natural due to one other unknown state of affairs that they’d already been by way of. Half II does the identical factor, but it surely's anticipated, so the punchline that was the joke the primary time round is now the punchline, however the conditions they didn’t learn about whereas they had been drunk are nonetheless the punchline. It's all in regards to the payoff, however when there is no buildup, how can we get the joke? As a result of we've heard it earlier than? "Why the lengthy face?" just isn’t humorous with out the horse walks into the bar.

When our movie opens, Stu (Ed Helms) is marrying the attractive Lauren (Jamie Chung). Her father (Nirut Sirichanya) disapproves, in all probability as a result of he noticed The Hangover , however the plans go alongside anyway. Doug (Justin Bartha) and Phil (Bradley Cooper) are on the point of go to Thailand for the marriage, and wish to give Stu a bachelor celebration. Figuring out that didn’t work too effectively final time, Stu as an alternative opts for a "Bachelor Brunch" at IHOP. Not ok. And as quickly as Alan (Zack Galifianakis) is invited, it must be apparent to everybody concerned that this isn’t going to finish effectively. In fact, Alan was liable for the mess within the first movie, however he additionally saved the day, so, in opposition to Stu's higher judgment, he invitations him to the marriage. They're additionally given the duty of taking care of the bride's little brother, child genius Teddy (Mason Lee). All of them go have a beer, and get up hours later in a shady hostel room, with Mr. Chow (Ken Jeong), with out Doug and, extra importantly, with solely Teddy's finger, within the deep coronary heart of seedy Bangkok.

Every character within the movie is lowered to a easy model of the higher characters that had been in 2009. Doug is lowered to the consciousness on the different finish of the cellphone (keep in mind Dwight Yoakam in Crank ? It's like that), and Mr. Chow is a sillier model of the effeminate gangster he was once. He's additionally fairly good pals with Alan. Phil is the one character handled with the identical care as he was within the first movie; he's by no means been the higher fourth of any of the group, however he's a very good man, and his parental look after Alan remains to be intact. Bradley Cooper does a superb job in these movies. I keep in mind, within the first movie, having fun with the child-like, clueless nature of Alan, and the way in which Zack G. performed him as such. He by no means made enjoyable of the character, and performed it with as a lot conviction as Johnny Depp does Jack Sparrow, however right here, the character just isn’t charming anymore, and he's a bit malicious; he's now not a foolish man-child, simply manic and unlikable. Stu, apparently, was given the correct quantity of self-confidence by the tip of the primary movie to tug any girl he desires, so he will get the picture-perfect Lauren, solely to succumb to the identical mess he did within the first movie, virtually to the letter. As a substitute of a superb man in a nasty state of affairs, Stu simply turns into a poorly composed model of himself.

The Hangover Half II is effectively directed, simply poorly written. Even the best-looking buildings might be poorly constructed. The absurdity and likability of the characters, most of them anyway, is compromised solely for eliciting laughs, and the conditions are usually not distinctive or amusing anymore. It's at all times unhappy watching a movie you’re keen on turn into a bastardized model of itself for a paycheck. In fact, there's at all times the caveat – The Hangover made me love these characters, and that was a personality piece. I nonetheless do love the characters, and nonetheless do care about them, and I’ll see a 3rd one, if it's made, which it virtually assuredly will likely be. I solely hope that somebody does one thing about Half II 's horrendous screenplay. They should return the characters again to their roots. Perhaps Phil will get divorced, and the boys attempt to cheer him up? I'd see that. I heard rumors of a Mr. Chow spin-off, however I don’t see that working too effectively. Perhaps it's the way in which they left his character on this movie, however I feel that will simply be a waste of time. Or, after all, Alan might get married. That's a comedy in and of itself.

[ad_2]